Princeton University
Princeton Weekly Bulletin March 12, 2007, Vol. 96, No. 19 prev next current
- Page One
- • Testing the boundaries of teaching science
- • Harris-Lacewell draws on intellectual prowess and common sense
- Inside
- • Energy plant wins award for reducing pollution and improving efficiency
- • Film about senior thesis performance earns honors
- • Students turn class into effort to help New Orleans rebuild
- • Exhibition, panel to document socialist architecture in Eastern Europe
- People
- • Spotlight
- Almanac
- • Calendar of events
- • Nassau notes
- • By the numbers
- The Bulletin is published weekly during the academic year, except during University breaks and exam weeks, by the Office of Communications. Second class postage paid at Princeton. Postmaster: Send address changes to Princeton Weekly Bulletin, Office of Communications, Princeton University, 22 Chambers St., Suite 201, Princeton, NJ 08542. Permission is given to adapt, reprint or excerpt material from the Bulletin for use in other media.
- Subscriptions. The Bulletin is distributed free to faculty, staff and students. Others may subscribe to the Bulletin for $30 for the 2006-07 academic year (half price for current Princeton parents and people over 65). Send a check to Office of Communications, Princeton University, 22 Chambers St., Suite 201, Princeton, NJ 08542.
- Deadlines. In general, the copy deadline for each issue is the Friday 10 days in advance of the Monday cover date. The deadline for the Bulletin that covers March 26-April 1 is Friday, March 16. A complete publication schedule is available at www.princeton.edu/ pr/ pwb/ deadlines.html; or by calling (609) 258-3601.
- Editor: Ruth Stevens Calendar editor: Shani Hilton Staff writers: Jennifer Greenstein Altmann, Eric Quiñones Contributing writers: Ushma Patel Photographers: Denise Applewhite, John Jameson Design: Maggie Westergaard Web edition: Mahlon Lovett
Energy plant wins award for reducing pollution and improving efficiency
Princeton NJ — The University’s energy plant has received a 2007 Energy Star CHP Award from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy for its efforts to reduce pollution and improve energy efficiency.
CHP stands for combined heat and power — also known as cogeneration — an efficient, clean and reliable approach to generating power and thermal energy from a single fuel source. CHP is not a specific technology but an application of technologies to meet an energy user’s needs.
The University’s CHP system requires approximately 21 percent less fuel than typical onsite thermal generation and purchased electricity, reducing carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 27,936 tons per year, according to the EPA.
In 1996, Princeton installed a natural gas-fired CHP system to support the University’s electricity, heating and cooling, and research needs. The University’s energy plant produces all of the steam and chilled water and approximately half of the electric power used by the campus. The plant runs 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year and includes a state-of-the-art real-time economic dispatch system to optimize energy costs for all steam, chilled water and power supplied to the campus.
The University’s CHP system requires approximately 21 percent less fuel than typical onsite thermal generation and purchased electricity, reducing carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 27,936 tons per year, according to the EPA.
“Our energy plant uses a very advanced real-time dispatch system to determine the most cost-effective means of supplying utilities to the campus at all times,” said Ted Borer, energy plant manager. “It is a highly-customized system developed by Princeton facilities engineering and Icetec, an outside company.
“The price of power and energy demands on campus change every few minutes,” he explained. “Using this system we are able to make the most cost-effective decisions about whether to make or buy power, burn natural gas or diesel fuel, operate steam-driven chillers or electric-driven chillers, and charge or discharge our thermal storage system. I am not aware of any plant of any size that runs as sophisticated a real-time analysis to make these decisions. So even while doing our best to reduce cost, we are still able to operate the cogeneration system in an exemplary manner that significantly reduces emissions compared to the more common practice of simply operating boilers to make steam and purchasing power from the utility.”