• Peter Lewis to give $101 million to advance the arts at Princeton
• Honoring King’s legacy
• University hosted visits by two political leaders
• Pilgrimage takes anthropologist on journey of self-discovery
• Operating budget includes funding for key priorities
• Klawe named president of Harvey Mudd, Tilghman appoints search committee
• Two win Marshall Scholarships
• People, spotlight
• Nassau notes
• Calendar of events
• By the numbers
Peter Lewis to give $101 million to advance the arts at Princeton
Princeton NJ — Peter B. Lewis, a 1955 graduate and trustee of Princeton, will contribute $101 million to support a major new initiative to enhance the role of the creative and performing arts in the life of the University and its community. The gift was announced by President Tilghman following Jan. 20 meetings of the Board of Trustees.
Peter B. Lewis (center) is pictured here with President Tilghman and Stan Allen, dean of the School of Architecture and chair of the President’s Task Force on the Creative and Performing Arts, at a reception Jan. 20 in Chancellor Green. (Photo by Denise Applewhite)
With this gift, Lewis’ total contributions to the University, both for unrestricted support through Annual Giving and for a range of designated purposes, now exceed $220 million and establish him as the University’s most generous donor in the modern era.
“Peter’s extraordinary gift launches a new era in Princeton’s commitment to the arts, and firmly establishes him as one of the most significant benefactors in all of Princeton’s history,” Tilghman said. “His gift is a visionary investment in ever-greater levels of academic excellence and leadership that will catalyze change in learning, teaching and the overall quality of daily life for everyone at Princeton. We aspire to create a distinctive educational model that seamlessly integrates the creative and performing arts into an undergraduate liberal arts program that is second to none. Peter’s confidence in Princeton will make this goal attainable.”
Lewis’ gift will fund a significant portion of an ambitious new initiative that Tilghman outlined for the trustees. That initiative — based on an intensive year-long assessment of Princeton’s strengths and aspirations in the arts — will include an expansion of programs in these fields, a significant increase in the number of artists teaching and collaborating on research at Princeton, and the creation of a new physical complex with improved and expanded facilities for the study and presentation of the creative and performing arts.
“Peter’s generosity will greatly increase the impact and prominence of our relatively small but extremely distinguished academic programs in creative writing, theater and dance, visual arts and music performance, and it will enhance campus exhibition space and our stellar Art Museum,” Tilghman said. “These programs increasingly attract excellent students, but Peter’s gift will give us an opportunity to establish Princeton more fully as a national and international destination for the very best students with talents and interests in the arts. This is also an opportunity to ensure that we offer students pursuing concentrations outside the arts the kind of meaningful artistic and cultural resources and experiences considered essential elements of an exceptional undergraduate education.”
Lewis, an internationally acclaimed business leader and philanthropist, is chairman of the board of the Progressive Corp., the nation’s third largest auto insurer. His previous gifts to Princeton include $60 million for the Peter B. Lewis Science Library, designed by acclaimed architect Frank Gehry and currently under construction; $35 million to establish the Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, named to honor his lifelong friendship with his Princeton classmate, the late renowned structural biologist Paul Sigler; and several gifts related to the arts, including funding for performance and rehearsal space for student extracurricular arts groups and student radio station WPRB in Bloomberg Hall and a suite of studio spaces for the Program in Visual Arts at 185 Nassau St. Lewis gave his first million dollar gift to Princeton in 1982 to create a gallery for contemporary art in the Princeton University Art Museum.
Commenting on his gift, Lewis said, “Princeton has always shown exceptional vision in targeting important areas of study and mastering them with conviction. This is an institution known worldwide for the excellence of its teaching and research in the humanities and social sciences, and in the natural sciences and engineering. Princeton now aspires to a similar level of excellence and distinction in the creative and performing arts, and I am delighted to participate in achieving this truly important goal.”
Tilghman’s report to the trustees was based on the work of a faculty committee chaired by Dean of the School of Architecture Stan Allen, as well as consultations with faculty, students, alumni, practicing artists and others and travels to other leading institutions around the country. The report identifies this as “a unique moment for the arts at Princeton University,” with an opportunity for Princeton “not only to expand its programs in the creative and performing arts, but to establish itself as a global leader in the quality of its offerings and in their integration into a broader liberal arts education.” Its commitments to fundamental research and outstanding teaching, and its support of interdisciplinary thought and practice, “allow Princeton to launch a distinctive initiative in the arts, one that breaks down barriers between theory and practice and thoroughly integrates intellectual and artistic pursuits into a shared educational and research mission.”
Tilghman notes in her report that Princeton “fully embraces the creative and performing arts as an essential part of its educational mission” and recognizes that “universities have increasingly become important patrons of the arts … where new ideas and forms of expression can flourish.” She points out that “by participating in the arts, our students develop cognitive abilities and forms of intelligence that complement training in other disciplines, and in some cases they discover talents and interests that will shape their careers and principal avocations.”
In addition, the report states that “the arts are also critical to the University’s ability to attract outstanding students. With increasing frequency, the most academically gifted prospective students have deeply felt commitments to some aspect of the arts. For the most part these students do not aspire to become professional artists, but they seek a university where they can integrate their academic pursuits with their artistic passions. … To compete successfully for these students in the future, Princeton needs to create a higher profile for the arts on campus and ensure that we have sufficient curricular offerings and artistic venues to accommodate student interests.”
As envisioned in the report, the arts would be in “dynamic partnership” with other University departments in the humanities and, increasingly, in engineering and the natural and social sciences as well. Princeton’s programs “should aim to engage the artistic talents, and excite the passions, of students in all the University’s departments, not just those with a special focus on the arts, and they should offer arts training to this broad range of students in the context of a first-rate liberal arts education. … Any university that aspires to offer students a great liberal arts education must ensure that they have meaningful experiences in the creative and performing arts.”
The proposal that Tilghman outlined for the trustees includes the following actions:
• Create a new Center for the Creative and Performing Arts that would oversee, coordinate and encourage exchange among the University’s curricular programs in creative writing, theater and dance, and the visual arts; serve as a focal point for scholarship, teaching and practice in the arts; and provide both “strong leadership and persistent advocacy” for the arts at Princeton. The center would work closely with the program in music performance in the Department of Music, the Art Museum and the Council for the Humanities. The center’s director would be a tenured member of the faculty and a “distinguished scholar or artist who teaches in the creative and performing arts and is seen as a leader for the arts on campus.” Tilghman envisions the center as “the hub of a dynamic community of creative endeavor that brings together students with faculty members and artists whose interests are well suited to Princeton’s distinctive conception of undergraduate education.”
• Create a new interdisciplinary Society of Fellows in the Arts which would bring “innovative and early-career artists/scholars” to Princeton to teach courses, maintain studios, give or organize performances or exhibitions and participate in seminars, conferences and other collaborations. The Allen Committee recommended the appointment of at least six fellows a year for terms of up to two years each. The fellows would include writers, actors, directors, choreographers, musicians, painters, video and installation artists and curators.
• Expand the size, resources and visibility of Princeton’s existing undergraduate certificate programs in creative writing, musical performance, theater and dance, and visual arts so they can “do more of — and do better” what they already do. There would be an increase in the number of tenure-track faculty in each program, but there would also be visiting artists on short-term appointments and junior artists in the Society of Fellows in the Arts who would “play a role midway between Princeton’s permanent faculty and the artists who visit on a short-term basis.”
• Establish a scholarly research program, as a joint venture between the new center and the Council for the Humanities, through which faculty, graduate students, artists and visiting fellows would collaborate on research, teaching and artistic enterprises. The council and the center could appoint several graduate students as graduate fellows each year who would participate regularly in seminars and colloquia devoted to the creative and performing arts, and could develop a visiting fellows program for faculty from other institutions as well as independent artists and critics who wish to devote time to scholarship and research.
• Provide additional physical space to house the new and expanded programs in the creative and performing arts, to serve as a focal point for creative and artistic activity at Princeton, and to increase the exhibition space available to the Art Museum, especially for contemporary art and special exhibits. The report identifies two locations to be considered for new arts spaces: the area south of McCarter and Berlind theaters on Alexander Street; and the area west of 185 Nassau St., the University’s current creative arts building, in spaces that are expected to become available in Green and Frick Halls when the departments of psychology and chemistry move to new locations. In either case an “arts neighborhood” would be created that the report anticipates would “become a magnet for Princeton students, faculty and staff interested in the arts and an important new point of contact for the campus, the surrounding community and the outside world.”
• Establish a fund to provide additional financial support for extracurricular activity in the arts which is “widespread, intense, lively and constantly evolving,” and help student groups find performance, rehearsal and exhibition space.
For the complete text of President Tilghman’s Report on the Creative and Performing Arts at Princeton, visit www.princeton.edu/pr/reports/arts/.